内容摘要：Despite those potential pitfalls, major brands and platforms have jumped on the live shopping bandwagon.

Despite those potential pitfalls, major brands and platforms have jumped on the live shopping bandwagon.

He fires through the windscreen, then shoots Muñoz, before again firing at Guzmán.As he runs away, he turns around and fires another shot at Muñoz, who is collapsing on the pavement.

Brugada, 61, was elected mayor of Mexico City in June of last year. The position is considered the second most powerful in the country after that of the president.While local politicians, especially the mayors of small towns, are often targeted in Mexico, attacks on politicians in the capital are more unusual.One high-profile exception is the ambush in 2020 of García Harfuch, who was Mexico City's chief of police at the time.

More than two dozen gunmen opened fire on his car and killed two of his bodyguards and a passer-by in one of the most brazen attacks to have occurred in the city.García Harfuch was hit three times, but survived and went on to become Mexico's security minister in October of last year.

He said the Jalisco New Generation Cartel, one of Mexico's most powerful criminal groups, was behind that incident.

Investigators have not yet said who they think was behind Tuesday's murder of the two aides, but security experts say the deliberate and precise way the gunman operated indicates that he is a professional hitman.US District Judge Allison Burroughs indicated Thursday she would later issue a longer-term hold, known as a preliminary injunction, that would stand while the case played out in court. That development would allow international students and faculty to continue studying at Harvard during ongoing litigation.

The legal battle is being closely watched by other US universities and the thousands of foreigners who study at Harvard and around the country.There are two main questions at play in Harvard's lawsuit, lawyers say.

Do the government's reasons for targeting Harvard's participation in the student visa programme hold up under the law?And, are those reasons legitimate, or just a pretext for punishing Harvard for constitutionally protected speech the administration dislikes?