The fierce battle over artificial intelligence (AI) and copyright - which pits the government against some of the biggest names in the creative industry - returns to the House of Lords on Monday with little sign of a solution in sight.
Perhaps to an extent both those things are true.The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology say that they're carrying out a wider consultation on these issues and will not consider changes to the Bill unless they're completely satisfied that they work for creators.
If the "ping pong" between the two Houses continues, there's a small chance the entire bill could be shelved; I'm told it's unlikely but not impossible.If it does, some other important elements would go along with it, simply because they are part of the same bill.It also includes proposed rules on the rights of bereaved parents to access their children's data if they die, changes to allow NHS trusts to share patient data more easily, and even a 3D underground map of the UK's pipes and cables, aimed at improving the efficiency of roadworks (I told you it was a big bill).
There is no easy answer.Here's how it all started.
Initially, before AI exploded into our lives, AI developers scraped enormous quantities of content from the internet, arguing that it was in the public domain already and therefore freely available.
We are talking about big, mainly US, tech firms here doing the scraping, and not paying for anything they hoovered up.It follows Meta incorporating an AI service into its messaging service, WhatsApp - a development it was
after grumbling from users.Media analyst Hanna Kahlert at Midia Research told BBC News the move followed the pattern of "social and AI trying to absorb each other".
She said it was not, however, necessarily what customers actually wanted."Users primarily still use social platforms to talk to their friends, and see their friends' updates," she added.